While public, or open space is available to all, there
are basic rules that everyone is expected to follow, regardless of the fact
that there is no written “law” on how to act in this space. Civil attention,
restrained helpfulness, and civility towards diversity are some of those rules.
When using public space, one is there to act as an individual, and therefore
not expected to help others or ask for help. One may act in any way they wish,
and be whoever they want, which is why one is expected to respect that others
do so.
Public space serves as a positive thing for all, but just as with anything good, there always comes criticisms. Above the others, I think that it is important to note that open space is not legible, and does not help one find their way around or get a better image of their surroundings, as streets would. Open space is there for equal use from all, but it not there to be of help.
Public space serves as a positive thing for all, but just as with anything good, there always comes criticisms. Above the others, I think that it is important to note that open space is not legible, and does not help one find their way around or get a better image of their surroundings, as streets would. Open space is there for equal use from all, but it not there to be of help.
For Thursday’s class, we
were assigned a video to watch called "Social life of small urban spaces.”
It goes into great depth on the different factors that affect our/the view of
urban spaces. The video talks about spaces which are mainly large open areas,
or plazas. It was interesting to see the role of little things you don’t really
notice in the city: they often times offer a large, important role. One thing
the video talked about was: in many plazas, benches are more of an artwork than
a bench. The video describes them as an architect’s "punctuation" on
an area. The narrator suggests that these benches need to be made larger in
order to promote more socializing among pedestrians. In relation to this, the
link listed below talks about the concept of “architecture of control.” It uses
the example of windows in a classroom: often times they are high enough that
kids don’t get distracted by what’s going on outside, but low enough that the
optimal light shines in. Conceptually, architects use the same concepts for
benches. If there is a particular feature of the environment they want you to
focus on, they place the bench accordingly http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/architectures-of-control-in-the-built-environment/.
Another interesting point brought up was the
stairs leading to these plazas or empty spaces. The use of longer and shorter
stairs offer a welcoming entrance to a plaza, while steep climbs will likely
turn people away from the plaza. These shorter and longer stairs can be
especially helpful for elderly people who may have trouble walking up huge
flights of stairs. Speaking of staircases… here are some pretty cool
staircase designs: http://www.toxel.com/inspiration/2008/11/22/unusual-and-creative-staircase-designs/.
I found the Architectures of Control in the Built Environment article to be interesting. Little things that one may have never noticed, like the placement of windows in a building, are actually very strategically placed to achieve a certain purpose. I also learned why some benches have an extra rail in the middle- to prevent people from sleeping on them overnight. Different aspects that combine to make up a public space are surprisingly well-thought out.
ReplyDeleteIt's amazing how architecture is more than just designing for each building individually. It has to flow with everything around it. Also, placement has to influence the environment around it. This means the placement of different things affect how people will live. For example, something as simple as what material is laid out on the ground affects how people will react.
ReplyDelete-Connor Buzzeo